Thursday, July 18, 2013
$17.50
$17.50 a day. What do I spend that much on? Easily a tank of gas, breakfast and lunch, odds and ends at the grocery store, etc. In the Seattle Times today there is a story about a single mom of two teenage girls living in Tacoma. If you divide her monthly food stamp allotment up by the number of days in a month, $17.50 is all she can spend to feed herself and her two kids. Her children's father does not pay her child support. She is unemployed and training to be a a medical office assistant. She cannot afford to buy food at the Safeway, which is close to her home because it's too expensive. Her car died, so she spends her money taking the bus to and from a Walmart much farther away so she can try to find cheaper food. I shop at Safeway. You can easily spend $6 on a couple of pounds of non-organic apples. There isn't a lot of wiggle room for things like meat or fresh fruits and vegetables on $17.50 a day.
I challenge those people out there who think that people are living it up on food stamps to look at what they eat, drink and feed their children in a day and ask themselves if, realistically, they could feed a family of more than one person on such an income. It's easy to label all food stamp recipients as the mysterious "they" and believe the hype about people cheating the system. Let's be honest. Wealthy people cheat on their taxes when they are the most able to afford to pay them. There will always be people who won't do right to save their lives. But we don't arrest or penalize ALL rich people because of the few who commit tax fraud. Cheaters make up a small percentage of those on the program. Let's be clear here. These attacks on SNAP are about further disconnecting the working poor from society. A 2010 study conducted by the Urban Institute found that the use of SNAP benefits reduced chance of food insecurity by 30 percent! Before you buy into the "welfare queen" mentality, here are some facts. According to the USDA, 48% of SNAP recipients are children and another 8% are elderly people 60 and over. So which of these kids is a "cheat?" Fewer than 10% of families who receive food stamps also receive TANF ("welfare") benefits. Only around ONE CENT on every dollar paid out in SNAP is lost to fraud or trafficking.
A society is defined by how it cares for its children and its poor. And shame on anyone who believes that children should be allowed to starve in the wealthiest nation on the planet just in case their parents MIGHT be cheating the system. At the end of the day, by attempting to not fund the SNAP program, that's exactly what the GOP-controlled House has said. Times are hard for a lot of people right now. Many of the kids your kids go to school will have NO FOOD at home without those benefits. And most of their parents never thought it would happen to them....until it did. According to Feeding America, in 2011, 16.1 MILLION (22%) of American children lived in poverty. Hunger has a face, and it is the face of a child.
Friday, July 12, 2013
Justice for Trayvon
My prayers are with the family of Trayvon Martin. No one has the right to claim that they were "standing their ground" when they stalked a person in the middle of the night based on nothing other than a personal stereotype about black boys in hoodies; assault that person; and then kill them because they refuse to submit to a stranger who is NOT a POLICE OFFICER and who was trying to jump them in the dark. Who would do that???
Neighborhood Watch my ass! Neighborhood Watch people have no police power, and they do not have the right to detain or physically subdue anyone unless they actually witness them in the act of a crime. Walking down the street while talking on your cell phone is NOT a crime. George Zimmerman belongs in prison. Let him "stand his ground" in there.
Neighborhood Watch my ass! Neighborhood Watch people have no police power, and they do not have the right to detain or physically subdue anyone unless they actually witness them in the act of a crime. Walking down the street while talking on your cell phone is NOT a crime. George Zimmerman belongs in prison. Let him "stand his ground" in there.
Wednesday, July 03, 2013
My Say So: Objects in the Rear View Mirror Are Closer Than Th...
My Say So: Objects in the Rear View Mirror Are Closer Than Th...: Forty-nine years is not that long ago. My mom will turn 63 this month, which means that for the first 14 years of her life, she lived in a w...
Objects in the Rear View Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear
Forty-nine years is not that long ago. My mom will turn 63 this month, which means that for the first 14 years of her life, she lived in a world where she couldn't sit at a lunch counter or go to school with white children. She couldn't sleep in most hotels, go into amusement parks or borrow books from public libraries. Do you ever wonder why when you see pictures of fun places and things from pre-1964 America that you never see people of color unless they are in staff uniforms? Because they weren't allowed into these places. Things we take for granted now were foreign to Black people in this country at this time.
Brown vs. Topeka Board of Education (1954) sent a message that the United States of America was no longer a place where "separate, but equal" was an acceptable social policy. But it wasn't until the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it was officially illegal to ban people of color from "places of public accommodation." However, something people often forget is that the CRA also banned employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Women have, by far, been the largest beneficiaries of the CRA.
So let us not forget that discrimination and prejudice touch ALL of us and when they are allowed to flourish, they destroy ALL of us. Just because they're not looking at you this time, doesn't mean it's OK. Those who fail to remember history are destined to repeat it.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/07/02/2245221/49-years-ago-today-america-banned-whites-only-lunch-counters/?mobile=nc
Brown vs. Topeka Board of Education (1954) sent a message that the United States of America was no longer a place where "separate, but equal" was an acceptable social policy. But it wasn't until the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it was officially illegal to ban people of color from "places of public accommodation." However, something people often forget is that the CRA also banned employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Women have, by far, been the largest beneficiaries of the CRA.
So let us not forget that discrimination and prejudice touch ALL of us and when they are allowed to flourish, they destroy ALL of us. Just because they're not looking at you this time, doesn't mean it's OK. Those who fail to remember history are destined to repeat it.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/07/02/2245221/49-years-ago-today-america-banned-whites-only-lunch-counters/?mobile=nc
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
